This article will guide you on the differences between GlusterFS vs Ceph Performance. The decision on transfer sizes could itself account for Ceph running faster or slower than Gluster.
Deciding whether to use Ceph vs. Gluster depends on numerous factors, but either can provide extendable and stable storage of your data.
Ceph and Gluster are both systems used for managing distributed storage. The goal is high performance, massive storage, and compatibility.
Ceph provides a POSIX-compliant network file system (#CephFS) that aims for high performance, large data storage, and maximum compatibility.
GlusterFS and Ceph are two distributed persistent storage systems. #GlusterFS is at its core a network filesystem.
Ceph is at the core an object store.